OBAMA WATCH CENTRAL

1st call for impeachment by member of Congress

'Absolutely,' Trent Franks tells blog, citing abandonment of DOMA law

Posted: March 02, 2011
8:19 pm Eastern

By Bob Unruh
© 2011 WorldNetDaily

U.S. Rep. Trent Franks

A Republican congressman has told a left-leaning blog that if there is collective support, he would favor the impeachment ofBarackObamaover his decision to stop defending the federal Defense ofMarriageAct.

Scott Keyes of ThinkProgress.orgaskedU.S. Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz.: "I know Newt Gingrich has came out (sic) and said if they don't reverse course here, we ought to be talking about possibly impeaching either Attorney General [Eric] Holder or even PresidentObamato try to get them to reverse course. Do you think that is something you would support?" Keyesasked.

Read all about the grounds for impeachment.

Franks replied: "If it could gain the collective support, absolutely. I called for Eric Holder to repudiate the policy to try terrorists within our civil courts, or resign. So it just seems like that they have an uncanny ability to get it wrong on almost all fronts."

Keyes was referring to theannouncement by Holder and Obamathat they no longer would fulfill their official duties to defend the law of the United States when it came to the Defense ofMarriageAct.

"While sexual orientation carries no visible badge, a growing scientific consensus accepts that sexual orientation is a characteristic that is immutable," Holder explained in a statement announcing the conclusion he reached withObama.

Holder said he and the president believe the law is unconstitutional.

(Story continues below)

"The president and I have concluded that classifications based on sexual orientation warrant heightened scrutiny and that, as applied to same-sex couples legally married under state law, Section 3 of DOMA is unconstitutional," Holder said.

Barack Hussein Obama

Keyes hadasked, "What recourse doesCongresshave? Could you, for instance, defund the Department of Justice if they don't reverse course and start to enforce the Defense ofMarriageAct?"

Franks responded, "That's probably the strongest leverage that we have."

In a followup question from Keyes, Franks said he would support "in a moment" a move to defund the agency.

Think Progress describes itself as a "nonpartisan organization" tied to the Center for American Progress Action Fund. It boasts of being named the "Best Liberal Blog" in 2006.

Comments on the site included mostly ridicule of Republicans:

"They have such weird priorities: they won't even investigate torture, but private relationships between consenting adults is something that gets their hackles up. I'm really surprised that impeachment hearings haven't already commenced. Must be part of the deal he got for not prosecuting war crimes."
"Republicans are acting like cry baby Democrat union thugs now."
"Impeach a president who shows support for the constitution? What doesn't this freak understand about equal rights for all … including rights for those HIS GOD created?"
"The teatarded and brain dead republicans need something to make them seem busy since they don't have a freaking clue what to do with the jobs and the economy. They know guns, religion, gays, abortion, and unnecessary wars. That is it."

But there also was a jab atObama:

"What other laws do you think KingObamawill choose not to defend in court?"

There was a massive negative reaction toObama's move. Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich described it as an attempt byObamato dictate his perspective to America .

"The president is replacing the rule of law with the rule ofObama," he said. "The president swore an oath on the Bible to ensure that the laws be faithfully executed, not to decide which laws are and which are not constitutional."

Mathew Staver, founder ofLiberty Counsel,said actions by government officials who were sworn faithfully to uphold the laws of the United States are "outrageous."

"This is a federal law and the federal government, including theObamaadministration and the Department of Justice, has an obligation to defend this law," he said. "This law has been attacked before and has been upheld as constitutional."

"This is tyranny," he said.

Judge Roy Moore, the former Supreme Court chief justice in Alabama and now chief of theFoundation for Moral Law,said his organization has filed an amicus brief in a dispute over the federal definition ofmarriage.

"I'm glad we didn't elect to depend on the president to defend our law," he said. "I hope nowCongresswill step up and take up the battle where the president has stopped."

He said such "arbitrary" decisions about a law's constitutionality have no placein America.

"Basically, he's not upholding the rule of law," he said.

A statement from Tim Wildmon of theAmerican Family Associationsaid, "As a presidential candidate,BarackObamasaid he was against homosexualmarriage. Many people at the time suspected he was intentionally being dishonest for political expediency, because he thought it would hurt his chances to beat John McCain if he said he was in favor of homosexualmarriage. Now the truth is out. He was lying."

Commentaries raised the issue that should the precedent stand, a subsequent president simply could say that he and his Justice Department no longer would defendObama's signature law, Obamacare, in court.

But it's far from the first discussion of impeachment, asWND reported

Jonathan Chait at The New Republic, before the 2010 election, predicted that the House would impeachObamawith a majority in the House, but he wouldn't be removed from office because that would demand 67 votes in the Senate.

"Hear me now and believe me later: If Republicans win and maintain control of the House of Representatives, they are going to impeach PresidentObama. They won't do it right away. And they won't succeed in removingObama. (You need 67 Senate votes.) But ifObamawins a second term, the House will vote to impeach him before he leaves office," Chait wrote.

In the public forum section of Chait's column, "Ironyroad" wrote, "They'll buy themselves a race war. People aren't going to take it lying down, because they'll know it's becauseObama's skin tone isn't to their taste, not because of high crimes and misdemeanors."

In his explanation of why he believes an impeachment could be forthcoming, Chait says the reason itself actually won't matter.

"Wait, you say. What will they impeach him over? You can always find something. Mini-scandals break out regularly in Washington. Last spring, the political press erupted in a frenzy over the news that the White House had floated a potential job to prospective Senate candidate Joe Sestak. On a scale of one to 100, with one representing presidential jaywalking and 100 representing Watergate, the Sestak job offer probably rated about a 1.5. Yet it was enough that GOP Representative Darrell Issa called the incident an impeachable offense," Chait wrote.

WND reported earlier when Maj. Gen. Jerry Curry,who served in Vietnam and commanded the U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command at Aberdeen Proving Ground during his long military career, suggestedCongressshould simply handObamaan ultimatum.

"Action should be taken by the Senate and should be taken by the House," he said. "They should serve notice on him and say, 'Mr. President, we love you but we want to tell you something. You're under a cloud of suspicion. We can't continue running this country with you in charge under this cloud. Now either you clear it up or you resign from office.'"

He was answering questions onStan Solomon's "Talk to Solomon" show:

Further, retired U.S. Maj. Gen. Paul E. Vallely,a noted military leader who now is a presence on the Internet with hisStand Up For AmericaandVeterans Defenderswebsites, earlier told WND he believesObamashould resign.

Vallely, who served in Vietnam and retired in 1991 from the U.S. Army as deputy commanding general for the Pacific, said, "We now must call for the immediate resignation of Barry Soetoro (aka PresidentBarackHusseinObama) … based on incompetence, deceit, fraud, corruption, dishonesty and violation of the U.S. oath of office and the Constitution."

"We can wait no longer for a traditional change of power and new government," he has warned.

"'We the People' have had enough. Enough is enough. TheObamaWhite House and identifiable members ofCongressare now on a progressive-socialist, treasonous death march and are bankrupting and weakening the country. We have watched them violate their sacred oath of office. 'We the People' cannot wait for and solely rely on the next round of elections in November of this year. It is now and each day that these public servants must put the citizen's interests above self-interest by resigning immediately," he said.

Peter Ferrara,on the American Spectator website, also has predicted Obama's resignation.

"I am now ready to predict that President Obama will not even make it [to 2012]," he wrote. "I predict that he will resign in discredited disgrace before the fall of 2012," Ferrera said.

WND also reportedthat former congressman and GOP presidential candidate Tom Tancredo said for current members of the House and Senate to uphold their oath to defend the United States against enemies "foreign and domestic," they need to file impeachment charges against Obama.

Tancredo wrote in an opinion piecein the Washington Timesthat Obama's "refusal to live up to his own oath of office – which includes the duty to defend the United States against foreign invasion – requires senators and representatives to live up to their oaths. Members of Congress must defend our nation against all enemies, foreign and domestic. Today, that means bringing impeachment charges against Mr. Obama."

At the same time, Times columnist Jeffrey T. Kuhner, who also is president of the Edmund Burke Institute,wrote,"President Obama has engaged in numerous high crimes and misdemeanors. The Democratic majority in Congress is in peril as Americans reject his agenda. Yet more must be done: Mr. Obama should be impeached."

Kuhner continued, "He is slowly – piece by painful piece – erecting a socialist dictatorship. We are not there – yet. But he is putting America on that dangerous path. He is undermining our constitutional system of checks and balances; subverting democratic procedures and the rule of law; presiding over a corrupt, gangster regime; and assaulting the very pillars of traditional capitalism. Like Venezuela's leftist strongman, Hugo Chavez, Mr. Obama is bent on imposing a revolution from above – one that is polarizing America along racial, political and ideological lines. Mr. Obama is the most divisive president since Richard Nixon. His policies are balkanizing the country. It's time for him to go."

Floyd and Mary Beth Brown, in a WND column,discussed theImpeachObamaCampaign.comthey launched.

And at the Taking America Back 2010 conference in Miami in September,Floyd Brown expanded on the idea.

Brown, president of theWestern Center for Journalism, said, "The Obama presidency is a disease. … Article 2, Section 4 (the impeachment clause of the Constitution) is the cure. And it's Obama's hatred of America that makes it absolutely imperative that we take action now.

"Barack Hussein Obama is not some do-gooder that has had his plans go astray," Brown added. "He is not a person of good will just trying his best to make America go the right direction. He is not. Barack Hussein Obama is a liar that absolutely knows what he's doing to the United States of America. He has a plan. He has an agenda. This man knows exactly where he's taking us.

"Barack Obama is a very dangerous man," said Brown. "Over the last two years, we have been watching the slow progression of what I call a bloodless coup."

Sponsored Link:Is this the End of America as we know it? Very few Americans are prepared for a day that will likely occur in the next 12 months, and will change our country forever. Eye-opening video explainsthe full story...

Related Offers:

Read all about the grounds for impeachment.

There's a new strategy to get answers to Obama's eligibility questions. See how you can help.

See the movie Obama does not want you to see: Own the DVD that probes this unprecedented presidential-eligibility mystery!

Join the petition campaign to make President Obama reveal his long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate!

Want to turn up the pressure to learn the facts? Get your signs and postcards asking for the president's birth-certificate documentation from the Birth Certificate Store!

Send a contribution to support the national billboard campaign that asks the simple question, "Where's the birth certificate?"

Get your yard signs and rally signs that ask the same question – and make sure it's in time for the next tea-party rally

Get your permanent, detachable magnetic bumper stickers for your car, truck or file cabinet – and join the campaign for constitutional integrity.

Get the most comprehensive special report ever produced on the Obama eligibility issue.

Previous stories:

GOP sweep revives talk of impeachment